Concordance and Acceptability of Self-screening Versus Screening by a Healthcare Professional for HPV, a Risk Factor for Anal Cancer, by Swab in People Living With HIV

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: HPV Infection

In brief

Anal canal cancers are on the increase in France, with around 2,000 new cases per year. These lesions can be detected by directed biopsies or smear tests. The incidence rate of anal cancer is 30 times higher in people living with HIV than in the general population. According to a recent study, the risk of anal cancer is highest in this population, but is also high in heterosexual men over 30 and women over 30. However, the proposal of a proctological examination in this population is not systematic. In France, there is no HPV screening for people living with HIV, but there is a recommendation for proctology consultation in certain cases, notably for men who have sex with men (MSM) or for women with vaginal cervical lesions. Several oncogenic HPV serotypes have been identified in the genesis of anal cancer. The serotype identified as the most carcinogenic is HPV-16 (89%). This study will look at anal HPV screening in people over 30 living with HIV, thus including a population for which no screening is currently offered (heterosexual men living with HIV and women living with HIV without vaginal cervical lesions), and will assess the concordance and acceptability of self-screening versus screening by a healthcare professional as part of a comprehensive anal cancer screening strategy in this population.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06507917
Run by
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
People needed
398
Starts
2025-11-28
Expected to finish
2027-01-02
Last updated by the study team
2025-12-11

Who can join

Age: 30 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.