Improving Engagement With a Process Measure Dashboard Through Precision Feedback

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Behavior

In brief

The study seeks to assess the impact of e-mailing specific, targeted, practice-pattern based information ("precision feedback") on provider engagement with a dashboard for a quality process measure (showing stent omission after pre-stented ureteroscopy), compared with generic information ("one size fits most" feedback).

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06465667

Run by

University of Michigan

People needed

100

Starts

2024-07-17

Expected to finish

2025-10-31

Last updated by the study team

2026-01-12

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Urologists participating in MUSIC that were in the top one hundred individuals in annual case volume from 2023 for "pre-stented ureteroscopy", the case for which the dashboard contents are most relevant.

You may not qualify if…

• Urologists that are not in the top one hundred individuals in annual "pre-stented ureteroscopy" case volume, urologists in the study team, or that opt out from the study at the individual or site level.

Where it is running

• University of Michigan — Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.