The (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Inguinal Hernia
In brief
This study assess the (cost-)effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique for unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children aged 0-16 years.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06451432
- Run by
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- People needed
- 464
- Starts
- 2024-02-01
- Expected to finish
- 2028-09-30
- Last updated by the study team
- 2024-06-11
Who can join
Age: any, up to 16. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Infants aged 0 months to 16 years of age with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing hernia repair
You may not qualify if…
- incarcerated inguinal hernia, which have to be operated immediately,
- recurrent hernia
- ventricular-peritoneal drain
- non-descended testis
- parents who are not able to understand the nature or consequences of the study.
Where it is running
- Maxima Medisch Centrum — Veldhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands (enrolling)
- FlevoZiekenhuis — Almere, North Holland, Netherlands (enrolling)
- Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC and VUmc — Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands (enrolling)
- Maastricht UMC+ — Maastricht, Netherlands (enrolling)
- Isala Ziekenhuis — Zwolle, Netherlands (enrolling)
- Alrijne Ziekenhuis — Leiderdorp, Zuid-hHolland, Netherlands
- UMCG — Groningen, Netherlands
- Erasmus MC — Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
- MST — Enschede, Twente, Netherlands
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.