Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy: US-guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsies vs CT-guided in Peripheral Lung Lesions
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Peripheral Lung Lesions
In brief
A non-sponsored prospective randomized single-blind national multicenter interventional study which aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy between US-guided percutaneous lung needle biopsies and CT-guided in peripheral lung lesions. Secondary endpoints are: * onset of number and type of complications during and after the procedure, within the first three hour; * exposition to ionizing radiation, in milligray(mGy); * patient comfort during the procedure; * duration of the procedure,
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06412289
- Run by
- University Hospital of Ferrara
- People needed
- 236
- Starts
- 2024-03-08
- Expected to finish
- 2026-10-31
- Last updated by the study team
- 2024-12-06
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 90. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Willingness and ability to provide free and informed consent. Age older then 18 years old.
- Peripheric pulmonary lesions adherent to the thoracic wall in CT scans with indication to typing
You may not qualify if…
- Inability to provide free and informed consent, in the absence of an available legal guardian.
- Age younger then 18 years old.
- Terminal neoplastic diseases/ palliative care patients.
- Patients with one lung, anatomical of functional.
- Severe non-treatable blood clothing disfunctions.
- Severe organ failure (pulmonary, renal, hepatic or cardiac).
- Women in state of pregnancy.
Where it is running
- UO Pneumologia AOSP-AUSL — Ferrara, Italy (enrolling)
- UOC Pneumologia - Azienda ospedaliera A. Cardarelli — Naples, Italy (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.