Letrozole-stimulated Cycle Strategy Versus Artificial Cycle Strategy (LETSACT)

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Embryo Transfer, Irregular Menstruation, Letrozole, Hormone Replacement Therapy

In brief

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy versus the artificial cycle strategy for endometrial preparation in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation. The primary question it aims to answer is: • Does the letrozole-stimulated cycle strategy for endometrial preparation result in a higher live birth rate compared to the artificial cycle strategy in women with irregular menstrual cycles after one cycle of endometrial preparation? Participants will undergo screening before endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer, following which they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: LETS or AC. In the LETS group, investigators will prescribe letrozole 5 milligrams/day for 5 days to stimulate follicular development and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day for luteal phase support. In contrast, the AC group will receive oral estradiol valerate 6-12 milligrams/day and micronized progesterone 800 milligrams/day. Researchers will compare the LETS and AC groups to determine if there are differences in live birth rates.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06372119
Run by
Mỹ Đức Hospital
People needed
790
Starts
2024-04-22
Expected to finish
2026-04-01
Last updated by the study team
2025-09-25

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 42. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.