Conduction System Vs Surgical Left Ventricular Epicardial Pacing For Coronary Sinus Lead Failure

Recruiting now

Conditions studied: Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

In brief

This a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients that undergo coronary sinus(CS) lead revision, comparing epicardial lead placement to coronary sinus pacing(CSP) in those that had lead failure.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06342492

Run by

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation

People needed

100

Starts

2023-11-07

Expected to finish

2024-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2024-10-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• All patients older than 18 years of age
• Patients with HFrEF that underwent BVP-CRT
• Experienced CS lead failure, whether initial or recurrent, subsequently replaced with transthoracic epicardial lead placement or CSP
• Underwent Medtronic, Boston Scientific, or Abbott lead placement

You may not qualify if…

• Patients younger than 18 years of age
• Transthoracic epicardial lead placement or CSP performed as the initial approach or for other reasons than lead replacement
• Those for which CRT no longer provides symptom relief or mortality benefit.

Where it is running

• Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute — Overland Park, Kansas, United States (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.