Composite Plug Vs D-PTFE Membrane in Socket Preservation

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Alveolar Bone Loss

In brief

The aim of the current study is to compare the effect socket sealing with flowable resin composite compared to dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane after filling the extraction site with xenograft particles in terms of soft and hard tissue changes, procedural time, post operative pain, patients' satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06315413

Run by

Cairo University

People needed

20

Starts

2025-05-01

Expected to finish

2025-10-01

Last updated by the study team

2025-03-26

Who can join

Age: 20 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients having single non-adjacent hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone that are indicated for extraction.
• Patients with healthy systemic condition.
• Patients aged from 20 to 70 years old.
• Good oral hygiene.
• Accepts 4 months follow-up period (cooperative patients).

You may not qualify if…

• Systemic diseases or medications that might affect bone metabolism, increase surgical risk or complicate post-operative healing.
• Previous bone augmentation to implant site.
• Untreated periodontal diseases.
• Para-functional habits such as bruxism and clenching.
• History of radiation therapy to the head and neck.
• Heavy smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes per day).
• Pregnant or lactating females.
• Alcoholism or drug abuse.
• Psychiatric problems.

Where it is running

• Faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo university — Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.