Physical Attendance Versus Telephone or Video Follow-up in Patients With Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors.

Enrolling by invitation · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Non-Functional Pituitary Adenoma

In brief

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the safety of routine telephone assessment versus in-person assessment during a two-year period for patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Secondly, to compare the quality of pituitary care in persons having biochemical assessment once versus twice a year. Thirdly, to assess the rationale of repeated assessment of pituitary function and imaging in patients with small pituitary tumors (microadenomas).

Key facts

Study ID

NCT06297473

Run by

Zealand University Hospital

People needed

812

Starts

2024-04-01

Expected to finish

2029-08-01

Last updated by the study team

2026-01-29

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Non-functioning pituitary tumor
• Diagnosed > 6 months from enrollment, i.e. found on MRI.

You may not qualify if…

• Planned pituitary surgery
• Planned radiotherapy
• Poor Danish skills
• Patient is considered by the treating physician unsuitable for follow-up by telephone or video

Where it is running

• Zealand University Hospital — Køge, Region Sjælland, Denmark

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.