PPG vs. ICG in Gastrointestinal Resections

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Anastomosis, Perfusion, Postoperative Complications, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Gastric Cancer (GC), Colorectal Cancer

In brief

This randomized controlled trial compares a novel optical technique against the standard of care for assessing tissue perfusion in gastrointestinal surgery. Participants are randomized to receive either intraoperative imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) or indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. In the ICG group, the fluorescence data are comprehensively analyzed in two distinct ways: (1) Qualitative Assessment: real-time visual interpretation of the angiogram flow by the operating surgeon; and (2) Quantitative Assessment: software-based analysis of fluorescence kinetics (e.g., time-to-peak, maximum intensity) to generate objective perfusion parameters. The study aims to determine the agreement between the iPPG-based evaluations and both the qualitative and quantitative dimensions of the ICG standard.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06222645
Run by
Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
People needed
200
Starts
2023-11-01
Expected to finish
2026-05-31
Last updated by the study team
2025-11-18

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.