Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Gas for Endoscopy
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Abdominal Pain
In brief
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of air versus carbon dioxide gas insufflation for endoscopy in children. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: •to determine safety of CO2 Assess patient comfort (abdominal pain, flatulence and bloating) with CO2 use when compared to air.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06134154
- Run by
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- People needed
- 350
- Starts
- 2024-01-24
- Expected to finish
- 2028-12-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2026-01-23
Who can join
Age: 1 and older, up to 18. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Infants and children 6 months to 18 years undergoing any upper endoscopy related procedure including but not limited to EGD/Colonoscopy, ERCP, EGD only, EUS, EGD with foreign body removal, Enteroscopy.
You may not qualify if…
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification System of 4 and above
- Children with chronic lung disease,
- Children who are wards of the state will be excluded.
- Children needing language interpreting services that is not Spanish.
Where it is running
- University of Alabama at Birmingham — Birmingham, Alabama, United States (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.