The N-LVA Study: RCT Comparing LVA vs. Sham Surgery in Cancer-related Lymphedema

Recruiting now · Not applicable · Has a placebo group

Conditions studied: Lymphedema, Secondary, Lymphedema of Upper Limb, Lymphedema, Lower Limb, Lymphedema Arm, Lymphedema of Leg

In brief

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) with sham surgery for patients suffering from unilateral cancer-related lymphedema in either the upper or lower extremity. It aims to answer whether LVA is more effective than sham surgery in terms of improvement in Lymph-ICF score. A total of 110 participants will be allocated randomly into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. The first group will receive lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), while the second group will undergo sham surgery.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06082349
Run by
Maastricht University Medical Center
People needed
110
Starts
2023-12-18
Expected to finish
2029-03-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-01-16

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.