Patch Study (Patch-augmented Rotator Cuff Repair)
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Rotator Cuff Tears
In brief
This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study will compare patients allocated to two treatment arms who are undergoing surgery to repair rotator cuff tears: (1) arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using fixation with anchors augmented with a synthetic polyester patch, and (2) arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using fixation with anchors and no augmentation with a synthetic polyester patch. The primary objective is to compare complications (primarily retear rates) and the secondary objective is to compare mid- and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes using standard orthopedic assessments, such as the subjective shoulder value and the Constant-Murley score.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT06076902
- Run by
- Spital Thurgau AG
- People needed
- 300
- Starts
- 2023-04-06
- Expected to finish
- 2027-04-30
- Last updated by the study team
- 2023-10-11
Who can join
Age: 30 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Adults with massive rotator cuff tear
- Tear must affect at least two tendons
- Primary surgery only
- Origin of tear can be either degenerative or traumatic
- German language speaking
You may not qualify if…
- Fatty infiltration grade 4 (according to Goutallier)
- Bilateral tears
- Cases of arthritis or severe osteoarthritis
- Structural or pathological condition of the bone or soft tissue that could impair healing
- Unable or unwilling to restrict activities to prescribed levels or follow rehabilitation guidelines
- Unable or unwilling to give consent (language barrier or cognitive impairment)
- Unwilling or unable to be assessed at 1- and 2-year follow-up assessment visits
Where it is running
- Spital Thurgau AG — Frauenfeld, Thurgau, Switzerland (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.