Surgery Versus Endoscopic Resection for Incompletely Removed Early Colon CAnceR

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Treatment Side Effects, Colorectal Cancer

In brief

Randomized head-to-head comparison trial among patients who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection of early colon cancer to evaluate the benefits, harms and burdens, as well as the ecological footprint and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic full thickness resection (eFTR), a minimally invasive endoscopic treatment with a colonoscope, as compared to standard-of-care surgery. Co-primary endpoints are * Rate of severe adverse events classified as grade III to V according to the Clavien Dindo classification within 30-days after study treatment * CRC recurrence or sign of lymph nodes or distant metastases at 3 years after randomization comparing the two treatment groups (eFTR versus surgery).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT06057350
Run by
Norwegian Department of Health and Social Affairs
People needed
304
Starts
2023-10-27
Expected to finish
2033-09-01
Last updated by the study team
2024-02-16

Who can join

Age: 40 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.