Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Rectal Neoplasms, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Anastomotic Leak, Quality of Life

In brief

The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05943444
Run by
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
People needed
256
Starts
2023-08-08
Expected to finish
2027-08-08
Last updated by the study team
2025-12-18

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.