The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Infertility

In brief

Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births than tubal flushing during HyFoSy.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT05882188

Run by

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

People needed

1102

Starts

2023-09-22

Expected to finish

2027-06-01

Last updated by the study team

2024-04-24

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 42. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation
• Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up
• Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language
• Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if…

• Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count <3x106ml (pre-washed)
• Known contrast (iodine) allergy
• Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days
• Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia

Where it is running

• AmsterdamUMC — Amsterdam, Netherlands (enrolling)

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.