pDIFFIR: Geriatric Periprosthetic DIstal Femur: FIxation Versus Replacement

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Distal Femur Fracture, Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant Knee, Knee Fracture

In brief

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures are a significant source of morbidity and mortality for elderly patients. One treatment option involved a surgical fixation with plates or nails, screws and cables/wires along the side of your fractured bone. The second method consists in replacing your knee joint with an artificial knee prosthesis (artificial knee joint). The primary objective is to determine if acute distal femur replacement improves knee pain and functional outcomes compared to surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes are mortality, reoperation, complications, post-operative pain and quality of life. A health economic analysis will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of both treatments. A total of 148 patients (74/group) will be enrolled in the study.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05805774
Run by
Unity Health Toronto
People needed
148
Starts
2025-10-17
Expected to finish
2032-12-10
Last updated by the study team
2025-12-18

Who can join

Age: 65 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.