Physiological Ventricular Pacing Vs Managed Ventricular Pacing for Persistent AF Prevention in Prolonged AV Interval

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Sinus Node Disease, Atrioventricular; Block, Second Degree (Types I and II)

In brief

A multicenter, prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation to evaluate the superiority of physiological ventricular pacing (proposed modality) vs. managed ventricular pacing (control) for prevention of persistent AF (PeAF) occurrence in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR≥180 ms) and indication for pacing: sinus node disease and/or paroxysmal type 1 or 2-second degree AV block.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05367037
Run by
Quovadis Associazione
People needed
640
Starts
2022-07-27
Expected to finish
2028-12-01
Last updated by the study team
2025-05-11

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.