Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions studied: Prosthesis Survival, Prosthesis; Cardiac, Heart, Functional Disturbance as Result

In brief

The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS. Any potential failure of the devices in question will be thoroughly investigated by means of CT scanning and biomechanical computational modelling, utilising finite element analysis (FEA).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05261204
Run by
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
People needed
4000
Starts
2013-01-01
Expected to finish
2029-05-31
Last updated by the study team
2026-07-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 90. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.