LFR-260 vs Traditional Phoropter in Visual Acuity Testing

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Visual Acuity, Astigmatism, Anisometropia

In brief

The purpose of this study is to establish if LFR-260 (investigational device) is not inferior in effectiveness to a traditional phoropter (control device) when applied in visual acuity test in subjects undergoing a full routine eye examination. LFR-260 proposes to provide information of the visual capabilities of the patient. The test will be provided and supervised by a qualified eye care provider. The informed consent, screening, randomization (into the order of visual test device used), (visual) device testing (to include precision testing, remote and offsite testing) will all occur at a single visit.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05259163
Run by
Evolution Optiks Limited
People needed
112
Starts
2022-06-07
Expected to finish
2023-01-06
Last updated by the study team
2024-09-25

Who can join

Age: 12 and older, up to 65. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.