Carotid Revascularization With MicroNet Covered Stent Comparing Early Neurological Outcomes With Distal Versus Proximal EPS

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Patients With Aterosclerotic Carotid Stenosis, Symptomatic Patients (Stenosis > 50%), Asymptomatic Patients (Stenosis ≥80%)

In brief

The SIBERIA study demonstrated a clear advantage of CGuard stent implantation over the existing classical stent when using a distal anti-embolic device. At the same time, there is no Level 1 evidence for a difference between the proximal and distal anti-embolic device for the CGuard stent.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05257161
Run by
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
People needed
366
Starts
2021-11-01
Expected to finish
2027-01-01
Last updated by the study team
2022-02-25

Who can join

Age: 45 and older, up to 80. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.