Comparing Postoperative Pain After Vessel Sealing Device Versus Conventional Suturing Methods for Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Pelvic Organ Prolapse
In brief
This study will investigate pain outcomes for patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic reconstructive surgery using the LigasureTM vessel sealing device as compared to conventional clamping and suturing methods.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT05192954
- Run by
- Marlana McDowell
- People needed
- 95
- Starts
- 2022-01-28
- Expected to finish
- 2024-10-28
- Last updated by the study team
- 2024-11-22
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 80. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- English speaking, able to understand informed consent
- Vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension
- with or without anterior and posterior repairs
- with or without removal of fallopian tubes or ovaries
- with or without procedures for stress urinary incontinence
You may not qualify if…
- Use of mesh for prolapse repair
- Robotic, laparoscopic, or open technique used for prolapse repair and/or hysterectomy
- Concomitant procedure done by an additional surgeon
- Concomitant anal sphincteroplasty or rectovaginal fistula repair
- History of chronic pelvic pain receiving medical care
- Daily use of medication for pain: NSAID, Tylenol, opioid, gabapentin, and/or amitriptyline
- Pregnancy
Where it is running
- Good Samaritan Hospital — Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
- Bethesda North Hospital — Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.