Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Epidural; Anesthesia, Catheter Complications, Catheter Blockage, Catheter Dysfunction, Catheter Breakage

In brief

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05168943
Run by
Damanhour Teaching Hospital
People needed
60
Starts
2025-07-01
Expected to finish
2026-12-30
Last updated by the study team
2026-01-12

Who can join

Age: 21 and older, up to 60. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.