Understanding What Matters Most to Patients: Establishing the Validity of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey

Completed

Conditions studied: Hematologic Neoplasms

In brief

This study will evaluate the validity of using a survey to quantify patient preferences at the point-of-care and the potential effectiveness of the survey to improve goal-concordant care. The primary hypothesis is that by identifying the strength of patient preferences for outcomes with this survey clinicians will be able to improve goal-concordant care by aligning clinical recommendations with patients' preferences. This study will have 50 patients with newly diagnosed hematologic malignancy complete the survey throughout their disease course (up to 2 years) and conduct qualitative interviews with a subset (n = 20) of participants. The information obtained from these participants will be used to refine the survey. Interviews with oncologists and palliative care specialists (up to 10) will inform implementation.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT05061095
Run by
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
People needed
51
Starts
2022-03-21
Expected to finish
2023-09-26
Last updated by the study team
2024-12-27

Who can join

Age: 60 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.