Ventilatory Strategy Based on Ultrasound Lung Morphology in Patients With Focal ARDS
Recruiting now · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Focal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
In brief
ARDS is characterized by a diffuse, bilateral, extensive alveolar-interstitial infiltrate related to damage to the alveolar membrane. Studies of lung morphology assessed by CT scan have shown 2 types of ARDS. When the loss of ventilation is posterior and caudal, and the pulmonary parenchyma is otherwise "healthy", ARDS is said to be focal. When the loss of ventilation is diffuse, associated with excess tissue affecting the entire lung parenchyma, ARDS is said to be non-focal or diffuse. Only one recent multicenter study has evaluated whether individualized PEEP adjustment according to lung morphology (focal vs. non-focal) could improve ARDS survival outcomes compared with standard of care. Results for the primary endpoint, 90-day mortality, were negative. But lung morphology was misclassified on CT occurred 85 (21%) of 400 patients. In addition, per-protocol analysis in which misclassified patients were excluded showed that mortality was significantly lower in the personalized ventilation group than in the control group. Lung ultrasound may be the ideal bedside imaging technique. The loss of pulmonary aeration and its variations induced by therapeutic maneuvers can be quantified by lung ultrasound. Lung ultrasound is a non-invasive, non-ionizing radiation method that can be easily used at the bedside. APRV ventilation coupled with spontaneous breathing activity prevents atelectasis formation, recruits less ventilated areas, prevents mechanical ventilation-induced lung injury and improves lung compliance. The hypothesis is that a "LUVS" ventilatory strategy composed of a bundle of measures all aiming at reopening the atelectatic pulmonary zones in focal ARDS (synergistic effect of spontaneous ventilation in APRV mode, early prone sessions, and adjustment of PEEP according to the patient's BMI), could decrease the number of days under mechanical ventilation, compared to protective ventilation with low tidal volume according to the current international recommendations
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT04966624
- Run by
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
- People needed
- 84
- Starts
- 2021-10-13
- Expected to finish
- 2028-07-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2025-11-25
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- person who has given oral consent or has been included in an emergency
- Older than 18 years
- On mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours
- Diagnosis of ARDS for less than 24 hours. ARDS according to the Berlin classification: i.e. arterial oxygen pressure to inspired oxygen fraction ratio less than or equal to 300, with a PEEP greater than or equal to 5, presence of bilateral radiological infiltrates not fully explained by heart failure or volume overload
- Focal ARDS determined on pulmonary ultrasound
You may not qualify if…
- person who is not a beneficiary of national health insurance
- person who is subject to a legal measure of protection (curatorship, guardianship)
- pregnant or breastfeeding women
- minor
- Patient having benefited from an invasive mechanical ventilation of more than one week in the previous month;
- ARDS in the previous month;
- Chronic respiratory failure under NIV or long term oxygen;
- Severe acute asthma;
- Lobectomy;
- Pneumothorax;
- Pneumomediastinum;
- Pulmonary fibrosis;
- Morbid obesity with a BMI above 40 ;
- Cancer with metastasis;
- Bone marrow transplantation;
- Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia;
- Cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score of C;
- Suspected or confirmed intracranial hypertension;
- Concurrent participation in another ARDS study;
- Extensive burns on the torso.
Where it is running
- Chu Dijon Bourgogne — Dijon, France (enrolling)
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.