Comparison of Articaine Mandibular Infiltration to Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients

Stopped early · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Anesthesia

In brief

This is a prospective, single-blind, parallel-design randomized controlled clinical trial that aims compare the effectiveness of articaine local infiltration to lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for restorative treatment of primary mandibular molars (PMM). Four to 10-year-old children who needed PMM restorations are enrolled according to inclusion criteria and randomly allocated into the articaine or lidocaine group. One operator administers all local anesthesia (LA). Using the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale, 15 trained and calibrated examiners, blinded to LA type, evaluate the subjects' reactions during LA administration and treatment. Children rate their experience using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Subjects' blood pressure and pulse throughout the visit are recorded. Results are statistically analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann Whitney-U, and Repeated Measures ANOVA (P\<0.05).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT04865848
Run by
University of Illinois at Chicago
People needed
42
Starts
2019-06-05
Expected to finish
2022-05-05
Last updated by the study team
2024-05-09

Who can join

Age: 4 and older, up to 10. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.