Anatomic TSA vs RTSA for Glenohumeral Arthritis

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Arthritis Shoulder

In brief

There are no published prospective studies that compared 2-year functional outcomes of RTSA and anatomic TSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuffs and no excessive glenoid retroversion. The primary goal of our prospective randomized study is to determine whether RTSA have at least as good results as anatomic TSA (non-inferiority), in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, without rotator cuff tears nor significant glenoid retroversion.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT04629391
Run by
La Tour Hospital
People needed
296
Starts
2020-09-01
Expected to finish
2027-05-01
Last updated by the study team
2026-05-22

Who can join

Age: 65 and older, up to 85. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.