Trigger Timing in Ovarian Stimulations

Recruiting now · Not applicable

Conditions studied: IVF Outcome

In brief

The use of antagonist ovulation stimulation program is increasing year by year, because of its convenience, flexibility, and prevention effect of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. However, many researchers and clinicians believe that the clinical outcomes of antagonist regimens are worse than those of classical long-term regimens. Studies showed that the reasons for that maybe antagonist protocol results in poor effect on oocytes maturation or endometrial receptivity. At present, the trigger time of antagonist regimen is more than three follicles with diameters of ≥17 mm, which makes the duration of gonadotrophin application in antagonist regimen is shorter than that of long regimen. Whether the trigger time of antagonist regimen is too early to cause adverse effects on oocytes, embryos and eventual clinical outcomes is unknown. This study hopes to compare regular trigger timing and 1~2 days delay of trigger in ovarian stimulations by antagonist protocol,in order to study whether delay 1~2 days of trigger will get better clinical outcomes than regular trigger timing in ovarian stimulations by antagonist protocol in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The results of this study will help infertile couples and clinicians to know and choose the optimal treatment in antagonist protocol.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT04163133
Run by
Peking University Third Hospital
People needed
834
Starts
2020-04-01
Expected to finish
2028-03-31
Last updated by the study team
2026-01-05

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 42. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.