Activated Carbon Interphase Effect on Surgical Incisions vs.Two Common Wound Dressings
Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Surgical Wound, Healed
In brief
This randomized, prospective study evaluates incision closure, post-surgical wound complications, dressing changes, incision/scar appearance, pain associated with dressing changes, and patient satisfaction rates of an activated carbon dressing versus two commercially available wound dressings.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT04038671
- Run by
- Brock Liden, DPM
- People needed
- 0
- Starts
- 2019-01-07
- Expected to finish
- 2020-02-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-02-24
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patients who are at least 18 years of age.
- Patients of both genders and all races.
- Patients undergoing primary, uni- or bilateral operative procedures of the forefoot, midfoot, non-heel posterior foot, ankle, and lower extremity and whose incisions are linear and at least 2 inches in length.
- Patients who are in good general health.
- Patients with no systemic or local active dermatologic disease, such as, but not limited to eczema, psoriasis, skin cancer, scleroderma, or chronic urticaria.
- Patients with vascular disorders must have been treated surgically to be considered for inclusion.
- Patients with diabetes must have ankle brachial index measurements greater than 0.6 to be considered for inclusion.
- Patients who have voluntarily signed the informed consent form, including HIPAA Authorization.
You may not qualify if…
- Patients who are younger than 18 years of age.
- Patients undergoing operative procedures involving the heel or whose incisions are non-linear, such as those with curved arches or "S" configurations, and/or are less than 2 inches in length.
- Patients with previous operative procedure around the same area or joint.
- Patients with systemic or local active dermatologic disease, such as but limited to eczema, psoriasis, skin cancer, scleroderma, or chronic urticaria, that might interfere with surgical site evaluation.
- Patients with history of previous local infection.
- Patients with autoimmune conditions.
- Patients with known allergies or topical hypersensitivities to silver or any other components of the study dressings.
- Patients currently taking steroids or other immune modulators know to affect wound healing.
- Patients with vascular disorders that are non-interventional.
- Patients with diabetes who have ankle brachial index measurements less than 0.6 or lower extremities that are non-interventional or by-passable.
- Patients who are considered by the investigator for any reason to be an unsuitable candidate.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to follow the follow-up evaluation schedules.
- Patients who refuse to voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Where it is running
- Circleville Foot & Ankle, LLC — Circleville, Ohio, United States
- Hocking Valley Community Hospital — Logan, Ohio, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.