Imaging for SIJ Injection Therapy

Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Joint Pain

In brief

The Research question: Among two standard image guidance techniques \[2-dimension (2-D) conventional Fluoroscopy Versus 3-dimension (3-D) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)\], which is the better guidance for Sacroiliac Joint Injection therapy and should be used first? The specific aims: To detect the difference of the first-time success rate, the cross-over rate, the procedural time, the radiation exposure, the incidence of adverse events/complications, and overall satisfaction score between the 2-D Fluoroscopy versus 3-D CBCT guidance for SIJ injection.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03992053

Run by

University of Washington

People needed

0

Starts

2019-05-31

Expected to finish

2021-04-07

Last updated by the study team

2021-05-05

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Age 18 and older
• Clinically diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain
• Medically indicated for sacroiliac joint injection (SIJ) therapy (with chronic sacroiliac joint pain, debilitating with pain score > 4 and not responsive to conservative medical management)
• Financial pre-authorization of SIJ injection approved by insurance
• English speaking
• Scheduled for SIJ injection on the Allura machine

You may not qualify if…

• Patient refusal or inability to study informed consent

Where it is running

• UW Center for Pain Relief — Seattle, Washington, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.