rPMS Compared With Pelvic Floor Exercises for Treatment of Urinary Incontinence

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Urinary Incontinence

In brief

This study will compare the clinical efficacy and safety between rPMS device and pelvic floor exercises for the treatment of urinary incontinence. The subjects will be enrolled and assigned into two study groups - active and control group. Subjects will be required to complete six (6) treatment visits and five follow-up visits - 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the final treatment.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03969368

Run by

BTL Industries Ltd.

People needed

60

Starts

2019-06-01

Expected to finish

2022-06-23

Last updated by the study team

2022-08-31

Who can join

Age: 25 and older, up to 70. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Female aged 25-70 years
• Suffers from specific types of UI - Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) and/or Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI)
• Voluntarily signed informed consent form
• Subjects willing and able to abstain from partaking in any treatment of urinary incontinence other than the study procedure
• Subjects currently undergoing any treatment for stress, urge and/or mixed urinary incontinence, have to undergo a two-week wash-out period before start of the study

You may not qualify if…

• Use of Botox® in the bladder or pelvic muscles in the last year
• Use of Interstim® or similar device for the treatment of UI
• Suffers from other types of urinary incontinence other than SUI, UUI, MUI
• Pelvic organ prolapse grade 2 and higher
• Pronounced lesions of the pudendus nerve during clinical neurophysiological examination
• Currently lactating
• Cardiac pacemakers
• Implanted defibrillators and/or neurostimulators
• Electronic implants
• Metal implants, including copper IUD
• Drug pumps
• Hemorrhagic conditions
• Anticoagulation therapy
• Fever
• Pregnancy
• Following recent surgical procedures when muscle contraction may disrupt the healing process
• Application over areas of the skin which lack normal sensation
• Any disorders that the Investigator deems would interfere with study endpoints or subject safety

Where it is running

• Boston Urogyn — Wellesley, Massachusetts, United States
• Center for Urogynecology and Reconstructive Surgery — Somerset, New Jersey, United States
• The Female Pelvic Health Center — Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States
• The Female Pelvic Medicine Institute — Richmond, Virginia, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.