Transseptal vs Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Neurocognitive Dysfunction

In brief

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) controlled comparative effectiveness trial of a transseptal approach to left ventricular ablation compared to a retrograde aortic approach to prevent cerebral emboli and neurocognitive decline in adults with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).

Key facts

Study ID
NCT03946072
Run by
University of California, San Francisco
People needed
153
Starts
2019-07-02
Expected to finish
2023-11-25
Last updated by the study team
2023-12-26

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.