Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Surgical Wound, Tissue Adhesion

In brief

To compare skin closure via subcuticular suture versus tissue adhesive (Dermabond) in urogynecological robotic surgeries. The primary outcome is incision cosmesis at the 12 week follow up visit. Secondary outcome is the operative time between the two methods of closure.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03891004

Run by

St. John Hospital & Medical Center

People needed

47

Starts

2018-03-20

Expected to finish

2018-12-31

Last updated by the study team

2019-04-04

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 99. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Women, ages 18 years and older, undergoing any urogynecologic robotic procedure at St. John Hospital and Medical Center from March 19, 2018 - November 30, 2018.

You may not qualify if…

• We will exclude women with active skin infections as they may contribute to poor wound healing and infections. We will also exclude procedures that are converted to laparotomy.

Where it is running

• St. John Hospital & Medical Center — Detroit, Michigan, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.