Study of Probable Benefit of the Neuro-Spinal Scaffold™ in Subjects With Complete Thoracic AIS A Spinal Cord Injury as Compared to Standard of Care
Stopped early · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Injury, Spinal Cord
In brief
This is a randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter, two Arm (Treatment or "Scaffold" Arm; Standard of Care or "Comparator" Arm) of a Neuro-Spinal Scaffold to evaluate whether the Scaffold is safe and demonstrates probable benefit for the treatment of complete T2-T12 spinal cord injury as compared to standard of care open spine surgery.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03762655
- Run by
- InVivo Therapeutics
- People needed
- 20
- Starts
- 2019-05-21
- Expected to finish
- 2023-12-31
- Last updated by the study team
- 2024-01-17
Who can join
Age: 16 and older, up to 70. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- AIS A classification of traumatic spinal cord injury at T2 - T12 neurological level of injury confirmed by a qualified medical professional
- Recent injury (must have open spine surgery within 7 days from injury)
- Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤ 45 at the time of screening
- Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS ≥ 14 (GCS ≥ 10 for intubated subjects) at the time of the screening and GCS = 15 (GCS ≥ 10 for intubated subjects) within two hours prior to spine surgery
- Non-penetrating SCI (contusion injury) that is no less than approximately 4 mm in diameter by MRI
- Requires open spine surgery allowing access to the injured spinal cord (subjects requiring either posterior surgical approach or posterior plus anterior approach will be eligible)
- Informed consent obtained
- 16-70 years of age, inclusive
- Eight-hour period of hemodynamically stability (>90 mmHg systolic blood pressure) prior to open spine surgery
You may not qualify if…
- Terminally ill subjects not likely to be able to participate in follow-up
- Incomplete spinal cord injury (AIS B, C, D, and E injuries)
- Subjects with more than one discrete spinal cord injury
- No discrete cavity in the contused spinal cord in which a Scaffold can be placed
- Evidence of clear and significant Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP) transmission through the injury site (based on the judgment of the Investigator)
- Subjects with clinically significant pre-existing neurological comorbidities that are unrelated to the contusion being treated (e.g. MS, ALS, significant prior peripheral nerve dysfunction, residual problems related to previous spine-related neurological pathologies) will be excluded only if it is felt that these preexisting morbidities will increase risk, affect safety monitoring, or confound study results
- Spinal cord injury associated with significant traumatic brain injury or coma that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude adequate assessment of spinal cord function, brain injury that could be associated on its own with sensory or motor deficits, or subjects with any other reason that results in an unreliable ISNCSCI exam
- Subjects with clinically significant pre-existing respiratory disease not related to the contusion being treated (e.g., COPD)
- Subjects requiring long-term ongoing mechanical ventilation
- Subjects with documented immune deficiency disorders, including a known diagnosis of HIV infection/AIDS
- Recent (according to DSM IV or DSM V criteria) history of abuse of narcotics or other significant substance abuse
- Significant injury complications where, in the view of the Investigator, participation in the study could further complicate subject care, limit study follow-up, or confound interpretation of safety or efficacy data.
- A female who is:
- Pregnant, or planning to become pregnant within the next 12-months; or
- Breastfeeding; or
- A woman of child-bearing potential (defined as post menarche and biologically capable of becoming pregnant [i.e., not surgically sterile]) who is engaged in active heterosexual relations and is not willing to use a barrier or hormonal form of birth control for 12-months following open spine surgery (e.g., oral, injected, or implanted contraceptives)
- A male who is engaged in active heterosexual relations and is not willing to use birth control for 3-months following open spine surgery including sperm donation or banking
- Current or impending incarceration
- Complete spinal cord transection as determined by screening MRI
- Subjects with spinal cord injuries directly due to gunshot, knife, or other penetrating wounds.
- Known hypersensitivity to PLGA or PLL (e.g., hypersensitivity to absorbable sutures containing PLGA)
- History of severe mental illness (according to DSM IV or V)
- Evidence of pre-trauma active local or systemic infection
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial for six months after open spine surgery
- BMI over 39
Where it is running
- UC Davis Medical Center — Sacramento, California, United States
- University of California San Diego — San Diego, California, United States
- University of Colorado Memorial Hospital Central — Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
- University of South Florida Health Neurosurgery — Tampa, Florida, United States
- University of Iowa — Iowa City, Iowa, United States
- University of Maryland Medical Center — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Rutgers Center for Spine Surgery — Newark, New Jersey, United States
- Elmhurst Hospital Center — Elmhurst, New York, United States
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai — New York, New York, United States
- Vidant Medical Center — Greenville, North Carolina, United States
- Penn Presbyterian Medical Center — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Thomas Jefferson University — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian — Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Rhode Island Hospital — Providence, Rhode Island, United States
- University of Texas Health San Antonio — San Antonio, Texas, United States
- Medical College of Wisconsin — Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.