Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion; Complications, Hemostasis

In brief

Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT03711916
Run by
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
People needed
20
Starts
2017-03-17
Expected to finish
2018-12-03
Last updated by the study team
2019-06-18

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.