Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions

In brief

Controlled randomized trial looking at Standard nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory support versus High Frequency CPAP in neonates who require respiratory support or who are being extubated and require support post extubation. Patients will be evaluated for need to be reintubated and oxygen requirement and PaCO2 levels

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03711565

Run by

University of California, Davis

People needed

0

Starts

2016-09-19

Expected to finish

2026-09-01

Last updated by the study team

2021-04-06

Who can join

Age: any, up to 0. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Newborn (0-28 days of age) admitted to Neonatal Intensive care unit (NICU)
• Ordered Respiratory treatment of Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure (NCPAP) respiratory support

You may not qualify if…

• Major congenital defect
• Known or suspected chromosomal disorder

Where it is running

• UC Davis Health — Sacramento, California, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.