Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors in Athletes
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Heart Rate Monitors, Athletes Heart
In brief
The purpose of this research is to compare four different heart rate monitors (Apple Watch Nike III,Fitbit Iconic, Garmin Vivosmart HR, Tom Tom Spark 3) to an Electrocardiograph (ECG) machine to determine the accuracy of the devices. Over the last two decades, there has been a proliferation of commercially available heart rate monitors. Elite athletes often use heart rate measurements to monitor training and fitness levels. In response, fitness companies have offered a variety of heart rate monitors to the general public. Previously, chest strap monitors that measured electrical activity were mainly used to track heart rates. More recently, wrist-worn monitors that use an optical sensor (light) to measure heart rate have gained in popularity. While the accuracy of chest strap monitors has been studied, there is currently no data concerning the accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. Assessment of the monitors' accuracy is important for subjects who rely upon the heart rate measurements to guide their athletic activity.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03612063
- Run by
- The Cleveland Clinic
- People needed
- 50
- Starts
- 2018-07-24
- Expected to finish
- 2018-12-13
- Last updated by the study team
- 2019-04-10
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Age > 18 years
- Patients are able to run a mile in 7 minutes or less
You may not qualify if…
- Presence of a cardiac pacemaker
- Known chronic and persistent heart rhythm disorders
- Tattoos around the wrist or forearm area
Where it is running
- Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.