Does Use of Rapid Response EEG Impact Clinical Decision Making

Completed

Conditions studied: Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus, Seizures

In brief

This study is designed as a prospective, non-randomized, observational, multicenter clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to observe if the use of the rapid responds electroencephalography (EEG) system impacts physician decision making. Secondary aims include exploring the safety and performance information of the Ceribell EEG system compared to conventional EEG system. The study will recruit physicians (Faculty physicians and Trainees) at up to five institutions and examine the impact of rapid response EEG when providing care to patients in whom EEG recording has been ordered for clinical reasons.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03534258

Run by

Ceribell Inc.

People needed

164

Starts

2018-04-30

Expected to finish

2019-07-31

Last updated by the study team

2019-08-20

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients undergoing clinically ordered EEGs.

You may not qualify if…

• None

Where it is running

• University of California Los Angeles — Los Angeles, California, United States
• Rush University Medical Center Pob — Chicago, Illinois, United States
• Massachusetts General Hospital — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• Wake Forest Baptist Health — Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
• University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center — Dallas, Texas, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.