Satisfaction of Limited English-Proficient Patients With Phone Interpretation Services Compared to In-Person Interpreters: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Pelvic Floor Disorders
In brief
The aim of the study is to determine if In-person interpreters increases patient satisfaction of URGYN office visits compared to the use of phone interpreter services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03470194
- Run by
- University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- People needed
- 106
- Starts
- 2017-12-15
- Expected to finish
- 2019-06-15
- Last updated by the study team
- 2021-04-05
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- LEP speaking Spanish and Portuguese female patients presenting to the U Mass UROGYN clinic with or without Ad-hoc interpreters
- Spanish and Portuguese speaking female patients with LEP presenting to the U Mass UROGYN clinic for an office visit of any type
You may not qualify if…
- Unable to provide consent
- Under 18 years of age
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- LEP subjects who decline interpreter services
- Non -Spanish or Non - Portuguese speaking subjects
- Patients with cognitive impairment
- Visually or hearing impaired patients
- Patients not requiring a follow up appointment
Where it is running
- U Mass Memorial Hospital — Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.