3D MR Versus 3D CT for Glenohumeral Arthritis
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Arthritis, Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
In brief
This study aims to assess the efficacy of three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) compared to three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging. This proposed study is a prospective, unrandomized, single-blinded, self-controlled, and single-armed diagnostic radiological evaluation study.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03379545
- Run by
- NYU Langone Health
- People needed
- 31
- Starts
- 2017-01-11
- Expected to finish
- 2020-06-05
- Last updated by the study team
- 2021-03-25
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patients suffering from glenohumeral OA;
- Radiographic evidence of severe glenoid erosion;
- Indication for TSA based on clinical exam;
- Patient is willing to participate by complying with pre-operative visit requirements;
- Patient is willing and able to review and sign a study informed consent form.
You may not qualify if…
- Prior arthroplasty at the affected shoulder;
- Patients with inflammatory arthritis;
- Patients with post-capsulorrhaphy arthritis;
- Patients with post-traumatic arthritis;
- Patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy;
- Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedures;
- Patients who are pregnant;
- Patients with implanted medical devices that are contraindicated to exposure up to a 3.0-tesla magnetic field.
Where it is running
- New York University School of Medicine — New York, New York, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.