Tramadol Versus Placebo in the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
Completed · Phase 3 · Has a placebo group
Conditions studied: Pain Management
In brief
The study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of IV tramadol compared to placebo managing postoperative pain following a bunionectomy
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03290378
- Run by
- Avenue Therapeutics, Inc.
- People needed
- 409
- Starts
- 2017-09-19
- Expected to finish
- 2018-04-23
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-03-19
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may not qualify if…
- Patient is not expected to receive a continuous infusion nerve block as described in the Post-Op anesthetic procedures protocol
- Patient is undergoing bilateral or revision bunionectomy surgery
- The patient has allergy or hypersensitivity (or is intolerant) to opioids or tramadol The patient has known physical dependence on opioids
- The patient has taken other prior/concurrent chronic medications that have not been at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to screening
- The patient is taking herbal or dietary supplements or medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 or inducers of CYP3A4
- The patient has taken monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, trazodone, or cyclobenzaprine within 14 days prior to surgery
- The patient cannot be withdrawn from medications (at least 7 days prior to surgery) that may lower the seizure threshold (e.g. anti-psychotic agents, MAOI inhibitors) or which increase serotonergic tone (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, triptans).
- The patient has a history of epilepsy, or is known to be susceptible to seizures
- The patient has a history of Long QT Syndrome or a relative with this condition
- The patient has expressed suicidal ideation or is considered to be at risk of suicide.
- The patient is morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m2) or has documented sleep apnea requiring pharmacological or device intervention.
- Clinically significant abnormalities in the judgement of the Investigator
- The patient was administered an investigational product within 30 days prior to Screening.
- The patient has previously participated in a clinical study with AVE-901.
Where it is running
- Trovare Clinical Research — Bakersfield, California, United States
- Lotus Clinical Research — Pasadena, California, United States
- Cheseapeake Research Group, LLC — Pasadena, Maryland, United States
- H.D. Research Corporation — Houston, Texas, United States
- Endeavor Clinical Trials, PA — San Antonio, Texas, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.