Diagnostic Efficiency of Touch Imprints Versus Smears

Completed

Conditions studied: Diagnostic Self Evaluation

In brief

Cytopathologists work along with radiologist in the diagnosis of lesions. Rapid on site interpretation (ROSE) of fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears of radiologically suspicious lesions is a common clinical practice. In the last years, the investigators have seen trend towards needle core biopsies of radiologically suspicious lesions. The investigators want to analyze the challenges of rapid on site interpretation of touch imprints (TI) of needle core biopsies (NCB) versus fine needle aspiration smears.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03224910

Run by

University of Mississippi Medical Center

People needed

47

Starts

2017-07-18

Expected to finish

2018-05-02

Last updated by the study team

2018-05-07

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• 1. Computerized tomography (CT)-Guided Fine needle aspiration (FNA) /Needle core biopsy (NCB) specimens from any site.2. Ultrasound (US) guided FNA/NCB.

You may not qualify if…

• 1. Specimens obtained through endoscopic fine needle aspirations.2. US-guided specimens from thyroid3. Exfoliative specimens like sputum or urine4. Gynecologic cytology specimens.5. Outside cytology consult cases6. Pathologist performed FNA's

Where it is running

• University of Mississippi Medical Center — Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.