Rapidly Absorbing Polyglactin 910 Versus Poliglecaprone 25 for Laceration Repair

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Dyspareunia, Perineal Tear, Sutured Laceration

In brief

To evaluate the rates of dyspareunia with rapidly absorbing polyglactin 910 compared to poliglecaprone 25 using a validated sexual function questionnaire. To assess maternal satisfaction with the laceration repair and suture material. To assess overall perineal pain using a visual analog scale. To assess the rate of wound breakdown and the need for suture removal.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03184077

Run by

Virginia Commonwealth University

People needed

318

Starts

2014-09-02

Expected to finish

2017-08-27

Last updated by the study team

2019-08-28

Who can join

Age: 18 and older, up to 50. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• English speaking, patients with first and second degree spontaneous lacerations or those with midline or mediolateral epsiotomies that were uncomplicated, and hemodynamically stable paitents

You may not qualify if…

• non-english speaking, women without laceration or with more extensive third or fourth degree lacerations, and inmates

Where it is running

• Virginia Commonwealth University — Richmond, Virginia, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.