Comparison of Two-hand Mask Ventilation Technique: Standard V-E Versus Reversal V-E Technique
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Intubation
In brief
This study hypothesizes that a novel reversal V-E ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique and will be easier to use.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03170037
- Run by
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- People needed
- 92
- Starts
- 2017-04-01
- Expected to finish
- 2017-05-11
- Last updated by the study team
- 2017-07-17
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Over 18 years of age
- Requiring general anesthesia
- BMI =>30
You may not qualify if…
- Untreated ischemic heart diseases
- Respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical class of 4 or greater
- Undergoing emergency surgery
- Requiring rapid sequence intubation for aspiration protection
- Non propofol - induction of anesthesia
- Requiring fiberoptic intubation
- Pregnant women or women who have given birth within the last month
Where it is running
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center — Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.