Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Dental Prosthesis

In brief

This study aims to compare how a single cap best fit on a tooth that is fabricated with digital and conventional impression techniques.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03146780

Run by

University of Rochester

People needed

22

Starts

2017-10-16

Expected to finish

2018-08-01

Last updated by the study team

2021-03-17

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Age of patient ≥ 18 years old
• Good oral hygiene and compliance
• In need of a single full-coverage crown on any vital premolar or first molar tooth
• Opposing tooth is free of indirect restoration (crown)
• Asymptomatic tooth free of pathology
• No requirement for additional treatment (endodontic treatment, post and core, crown lengthening)
• Anticipated supragingival or equigingival crown margin
• Anticipated crown margin on natural tooth structure
• Adequate abutment height after tooth preparation (minimum 4mm)

You may not qualify if…

• Age of patient less than 18 years old
• Poor oral hygiene and calculus on sample teeth
• In need of a single full-coverage crown on tooth other than a vital premolar or first molar tooth
• Opposing tooth is restored with indirect restoration
• Periapical or periodontal pathology
• Anticipated pulp exposure or need for additional treatment (endodontic treatment, post and core, crown lengthening)
• Anticipated subgingival crown margin
• Anticipated crown margin on direct restoration
• Inadequate abutment height after tooth preparation

Where it is running

• University of Rochester — Rochester, New York, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.