Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Goff Transpancreatic Septotomy vs. Double Wire Technique for Achieving Biliary Access in Technically Challenging ERCPs
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Biliary Obstruction, Biliary Stones
In brief
Randomized, prospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of Goff transpancreatic septotomy vs. double wire technique for achieving biliary access in patients who fail initial cannulation at ERCP.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03118973
- Run by
- Subhas Banerjee
- People needed
- 1600
- Starts
- 2016-09-27
- Expected to finish
- 2020-01-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2020-11-13
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Age 18 and older
- Patient has a clinical indication for ERCP
- Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if…
- Age <18
- Potentially vulnerable subjects including, homeless people, pregnant females, employees and students.
- Complex post-surgical anatomy e.g. Billroth type II anatomy, Roux-en-Y-gastrojejunostomy
- Prior sphincterotomy or balloon dilation of ampulla
- Thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, or indication for ongoing anti-coagulation therapy
- Participation in another investigational study that may directly or indirectly affect the results of this study within 30 days prior to the initial visit
Where it is running
- Stanford University School of Medicine — Stanford, California, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.