Comparison of Implant Positioning With Robotic Aided Surgery and Traditional Jig Positioning in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Knee Arthritis

In brief

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes and accuracy of implant positioning in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty with traditional manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT03052790

Run by

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

People needed

0

Starts

2018-07-01

Expected to finish

2019-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2019-04-04

Who can join

Age: 25 and older, up to 95. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients who have knee pain and are candidates for total knee arthroplasty
• Patients able to consent to be included in the study

You may not qualify if…

• Patients with previous total or partial knee arthroplasty in need of revision surgery
• Patients unable to or unwilling to undergo post-operative CT scans after understanding the risks and benefits

Where it is running

• The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston — Houston, Texas, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.