IN.PACT™ AV Access IDE Study
Completed · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis, Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion, Arteriovenous Fistula, Fistula
In brief
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the IN.PACT™ AV Access Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for treatment of subjects presenting with de novo or non-stented restenotic obstructive lesion of native arteriovenous dialysis fistulae (AVF) in the upper extremity.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT03041467
- Run by
- Medtronic Endovascular
- People needed
- 330
- Starts
- 2017-04-25
- Expected to finish
- 2023-05-05
- Last updated by the study team
- 2024-05-29
Who can join
Age: 21 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patient is ≥21 years of age.
- Patient has a life expectancy of ≥ 12 months
- Patient has a native AV fistula created ≥ 60 days prior to the index procedure
- The target AV fistula has undergone successful dialysis for at least 8 of 12 sessions during a four week period
- Patient has a de novo and/or non-stented restenotic lesion located between the arteriovenous anastomosis and axillosubclavian junction with ≥50% stenosis. Note: If the lesion is located in the anastomosis, the treatment may be delivered up to 2 cm upstream on the arterial side. If the lesion is located in the cephalic arch, the treatment may be delivered up to 2 cm into the subclavian vein
- Patient has a target lesion or a tandem lesion that is ≤ 100 mm in length (by visual estimate) Note: Tandem lesions may be enrolled provided they meet all of the following criteria: Separated by a gap of ≤ 30mm (3 cm), total combined lesion length, including 30 mm gap, ≤ 100 mm, and able to be treated as a single lesion
- Patient has a target vessel diameter of 4.0 - 12.0 mm (by visual estimate).
- Patient underwent successful crossing of the target lesion with the guide wire and pre-dilatation with a high pressure PTA balloon defined as: residual stenosis of ≤ 30% and absence of a flow limiting dissection (Grade ≥ C) or perforation
- Patient provides written consent prior to enrollment in the study
- Patient is willing to comply with all follow-up evaluations at specified times
You may not qualify if…
- Women who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or are intending to become pregnant, or men intending to father children
- Patient is receiving immunosuppressive therapy
- Patient is anticipating a kidney transplant within 6 months of enrollment into the study
- Patient has undergone prior intervention of access site within 30 days of index procedure
- Patient with anticipated conversion to peritoneal dialysis
- Patient has an infected AV access or systemic infection
- Patient has planned surgical revision of access site
- Patient with secondary non-target lesion requiring treatment within 30-days post index procedure
- Patient with hemodynamically significant central venous stenoses that cannot be successfully treated prior to treatment of the target lesion
- Patient with target AVF or access circuit which previously had or currently has a thrombosis
- Patients judged to have a lesion that prevents complete inflation of an angioplasty balloon or proper placement of the delivery system
- Patient with target lesion located central to the axillosubclavian junction
- Patient has significant arterial inflow lesion requiring treatment more than 2 cm upstream from the anastomosis in the AV access
- Patient has presence of pseudoaneurysm or aneurysm requiring treatment at the lesion site
- Patient has presence of a stent located in the target AV access circuit
- Patients with known allergies or sensitivities to paclitaxel
- Patient with known contraindication, including allergic reaction, or sensitivity to contrast material that cannot be adequately pre-treated
- Patient who cannot receive recommended antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy
- Patient with clinically significant Steal Syndrome requiring treatment
- Patient is enrolled in another investigational drug, device, or biological study and has not completed the primary endpoint, or was previously enrolled in this study
- Patient has a comorbid-condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator, may cause him/her to be non-compliant with the protocol of confound data interpretation
Where it is running
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital — Birmingham, Alabama, United States
- SKI Vascular Center — Tempe, Arizona, United States
- Capital Nephrology Medical Group — Sacramento, California, United States
- Florida Research Network — Gainesville, Florida, United States
- Coastal Vascular and Interventional — Pensacola, Florida, United States
- Christie Clinic Vein and Vascular Center — Champaign, Illinois, United States
- Rush University Medical Center — Chicago, Illinois, United States
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics — Iowa City, Iowa, United States
- King's Daughters Medical Center — Ashland, Kentucky, United States
- Mayo Clinic — Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Holy Name Medical Center — Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
- The Mount Sinai Hospital — New York, New York, United States
- North Carolina Nephrology PA — Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
- Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland, Ohio, United States
- Dialysis Access Institute — Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
- Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center — Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
- University Surgical Associates — Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
- Dallas Nephrology Associates — Plano, Texas, United States
- Sentara Vascular Specialists — Norfolk, Virginia, United States
- Richmond Vascular Center — North Chesterfield, Virginia, United States
- Vascular Institute of Virginia — Woodbridge, Virginia, United States
- Kansai Rosai Hospital — Amagasaki, Japan
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital — Kamakura, Japan
- Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital — Kishiwada, Japan
- Saitama Medical Center Saitama Medical University — Saitama, Japan
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.