VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Videolaryngoscopes (VL), Direct Laryngoscopy (DL), Inexperienced Users

In brief

This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02991820

Run by

Joseph D. Tobias

People needed

43

Starts

2016-06-01

Expected to finish

2017-05-01

Last updated by the study team

2018-07-18

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Faculty pediatric anesthesiologists
• CRNAs
• Trainees (SRNAs, residents, fellows, and medical students)
• Nurses from NCH

You may not qualify if…

• If subjects are unwilling to participate.

Where it is running

• Nationwide Children's Hospital — Columbus, Ohio, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.