The Comparative Efficacy of the Zio Patch vs Implantable Loop Recorder in Atrial Fibrillation

Withdrawn before enrolling · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Atrial Fibrillation

In brief

The aim of our study is to investigate if LTCM's are superior to implantable loop recorders in detecting atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation. This study will provide insights on a possible alternative for detection of arrhythmia.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT02954380

Run by

University of Florida

People needed

0

Starts

2016-11-01

Expected to finish

2018-06-01

Last updated by the study team

2017-03-27

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• Patients with a diagnosis of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation documented on electrocardiography
• Patients must already have a Medtronic LINQ ILR as standard of care already implanted as standard of care
• Patients must be available for at least 7 but maximum of 14 days after patch application
• Patients must be greater than or equal to 18 years old.

You may not qualify if…

• Patients with a history of permanent atrial fibrillation
• Patients with an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator
• Patients with cognitive delay and or dementia
• Patients unable to give Consent.
• Patients with adhesive allergy

Where it is running

• University of Florida — Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.