Study Comparing Regional Anesthetic Blocks and Periarticular Infiltration for the Management of Post-operative Pain After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
Stopped early · Not applicable
Conditions studied: Degenerative Joint Disease
In brief
To compare two methods of post-operative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. There is a perception that the periarticular injections may not be as effective in controlling post-operative pain. Both methods are current standard of care. The investigators want to compare the outcomes of each when patients are randomized to one of the methods compared to the other method of post-operative pain control.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT02904993
- Run by
- Mayo Clinic
- People needed
- 9
- Starts
- 2016-05-01
- Expected to finish
- 2016-10-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2016-11-16
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 80. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Subject scheduled for Direct Anterior unilateral total hip replacement
- Weight ≥ 50 and ≤125 kg
- Intact neurological exam
- Cognitively intact with ability to sign consent
You may not qualify if…
- Renal insufficiency with creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
- Allergic to any of the following : Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Morphine sulfate, NSAIDs, Tylenol, Neurontin, Morphine, Oxycodone or Dilaudid.
- Subject taking regular narcotic medications prior to surgery (20mg/day Morphine equivalents for >7days)
- Subject with prior open hip surgery who received regional anesthesia or periarticular injection for post op pain management.
- Subject with contraindication for spinal anesthesia
Where it is running
- Mayo Clinic in Florida — Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.